VAN GOGH, PICASSO, GAUGIN ET AL - PLAGIARISTS OR NOT?
Apparently Lee Krasner painted this in 1948. It's in the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, so I presume it's safe to say it's not plagiaristic. And to be precise plagiarism is copying, which is why those making a living from painting works by famous artists change the size. On the other hand, I don't know. I don't see a change in context in Krasner's work, as is claimed for Lichtenstein or Warhol. I find it equally difficult to accept all those working in Gerhard Richter's non-representational style as anything other than poor to middling copies. What's in a style you might ask? The ukiyo-e woodblock prints imported from Japan after 1853 directly influenced both impressionist and post-impressionist artists such as Cezanne and Gaugin, not to mention Van Gogh, hence the flattened perspectives, bright colours and defined outlines in their work. For his part Degas adopted the three quarter perspective and asymmetrical placing of figures on a diagonal....